DawnWatch: New York Times Magazine cover story on nutrition 1/28/07
Sunday, January 28th, 2007
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: DawnWatch - news [at] dawnwatch.com
Date: Jan 28, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: DawnWatch: New York Times Magazine cover story on nutrition 1/28/07
The cover story of this week’s (January 28) Sunday New York Times Magazine is “The Age of Nutritionism: How Scientists Have Ruined the Way We Eat.” It is by Michael Pollan, the well-known author of “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” and of various other New York Magazine stories on food. Inside, page 39, the article is headed, “Unhappy Meals: Thirty years of nutritional science has made Americans sicker, fatter and less well nourished. A plea for a return to plain old food.”
Pollan opens with:
“Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.
“That, more or less, is the short answer to the supposedly incredibly complicated and confusing question of what we humans should eat in order to be maximally healthy.”
Pollan discusses the science of “nutritionism,” writing, “it really wasn’t until late in the 20th century that nutrients managed to push food aside in the popular imagination of what it means to eat.”
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: DawnWatch - news [at] dawnwatch.com
Date: Jan 28, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: DawnWatch: New York Times Magazine cover story on nutrition 1/28/07
The cover story of this week’s (January 28) Sunday New York Times Magazine is “The Age of Nutritionism: How Scientists Have Ruined the Way We Eat.” It is by Michael Pollan, the well-known author of “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” and of various other New York Magazine stories on food. Inside, page 39, the article is headed, “Unhappy Meals: Thirty years of nutritional science has made Americans sicker, fatter and less well nourished. A plea for a return to plain old food.”
Pollan opens with:
“Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.
“That, more or less, is the short answer to the supposedly incredibly complicated and confusing question of what we humans should eat in order to be maximally healthy.”
Pollan discusses the science of “nutritionism,” writing, “it really wasn’t until late in the 20th century that nutrients managed to push food aside in the popular imagination of what it means to eat.”





